How to set up a UGC content workflow without sounding desperate
Most "UGC programs" produce content that looks scripted because it was. Here is the request-and-edit workflow that produces user content that actually feels like user content.
Most "UGC programs" produce content that looks scripted because it was. Here is the request-and-edit workflow that produces user content that actually feels like user content.
The reason most UGC content looks fake is that it was: a brand briefed a creator, the creator delivered "authentic" footage to spec, and viewers can smell it from three scrolls away. There is a better way that takes more patience and less budget.
Stop asking customers to "make a UGC video for us". Ask them to send you the clip they already have — the screenshot they posted in their own Slack when they got a result, the iPhone video they took on the day a feature shipped. UGC works when the customer was already going to make the content for themselves; the brand just gets to use it.
One real piece of UGC per 8–12 brand posts is the sweet spot. More than that and the program tips into "performative UGC" — your feed starts looking like it is performing authenticity, which is the exact opposite of authentic.
For first-party UGC (your existing customers), the cleanest model is no payment, real credit, and the occasional thank-you in product (custom Slack emoji, early access, branded swag if they want it). Once money enters the equation the content drifts toward "creator content", which is fine but is a different program — and should be labelled "paid partnership" by every regulator that matters.
Postify automates drafting, scheduling, and approvals across every channel.